<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hoylake Pool 1930&#8242;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hoylakejunction.com/hoylake-pool-1930s/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hoylakejunction.com/hoylake-pool-1930s</link>
	<description>Hoylake News, Views and much more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.hoylakejunction.com/hoylake-pool-1930s#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hoylakejunction.com/?p=789#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>They both look like swimming pools not paddling pools. Maybe one pool was for ladies and another for gentlemen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They both look like swimming pools not paddling pools. Maybe one pool was for ladies and another for gentlemen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hankin</title>
		<link>http://www.hoylakejunction.com/hoylake-pool-1930s#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hankin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hoylakejunction.com/?p=789#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>Peter - quite right it is the first baths, and having looked at the sequence of photo&#039;s I&#039;ve got, (with apologies to John for mis-informing him about the date), it&#039;s the 1920&#039;s not the 1930&#039;s. The baths were re-built in the late 1920&#039;s so this was probably my grandfather rather than my father who took the picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter &#8211; quite right it is the first baths, and having looked at the sequence of photo&#8217;s I&#8217;ve got, (with apologies to John for mis-informing him about the date), it&#8217;s the 1920&#8242;s not the 1930&#8242;s. The baths were re-built in the late 1920&#8242;s so this was probably my grandfather rather than my father who took the picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.hoylakejunction.com/hoylake-pool-1930s#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hoylakejunction.com/?p=789#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>What a fascinating photo. Not seen that before. Is this not the first Hoylake baths which were replaced by the much more modern pool in the &#039;30s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a fascinating photo. Not seen that before. Is this not the first Hoylake baths which were replaced by the much more modern pool in the &#8217;30s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.hoylakejunction.com @ 2012-02-11 17:47:42 -->
